The Greatest Common Factor (GCF), Highest Common Factor (HCF) or Greatest Common Divisor (GCD) of 60, 67 and 83 is 1.
We can calculate the Greatest Common Factor or GCF in multiple simple and easy ways:
Let us look at each of these methods, and calculate the GCF of 60, 67 and 83.
This is the most simple method, and also the most effective. All we need to do here is find the common prime factors for 60, 67 and 83, and then multiply them.
As you can see below, the prime factors of 60 are 2, 3, 5.
Let's illustrate the prime factorization of 60 in exponential form:
As you can see below, the prime factors of 67 are 67.
Let's illustrate the prime factorization of 67 in exponential form:
As you can see below, the prime factors of 83 are 83.
Let's illustrate the prime factorization of 83 in exponential form:
Identifying the common prime factors from our computations above, we can see that the common prime factors of 60, 67 and 83 are none.
So, common prime factors would be
Find the product of all common prime factors by multiplying them:
That's it! We have found the Greatest Common Factor of 60, 67 and 83 using the prime factorization method.
According to our calculations above, the GCF of 60, 67 and 83 is 1.
With this simple method, we'll need to find all the factors of 60 and 67 and 83, and then identify the common factors.
The greatest common factor (GCF) is the largest of these common factors.
Remember, factors are numbers that divide another number without a remainder.
The steps are simple:
"1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "10", "12", "15", "20", "30" and "60"
"1" and "67"
"1" and "83"
As you can see in the lists of factors from above, for the numbers 60, 67 and 83, the common factors have been highlighted for clarity.
According to our calculations above, the Greatest Common Factor (GCF) of 60, 67 and 83 is 1.
The Euclidean algorithm proceeds in a series of steps, with the output of each step used as the input for the next.
The Euclidean algorithm is based on the principle that the greatest common divisor of two numbers does not change if the larger number is replaced by its difference with the smaller number.
For example, the GCD of 252 and 105 is exactly the same as the GCD of 147 (= 252 - 105) and 105. Since the larger of the two numbers is reduced, repeating this process gives successively smaller pairs of numbers until the two numbers become equal. When that occurs, they are the GCD of the original two numbers.
By reversing the steps, the GCD can be expressed as a sum of the two original numbers each multiplied by a positive or negative integer, e.g., 21 = 5 × 105 + (−2) × 252. The fact that the GCD can always be expressed in this way is known as Bézout's identity.
To put it in the form of a formula, if
So, can we use the Euclidean algorithm to calculate the GCF of 60, 67 and 83?
The answer is YES.
But, should we use the Euclidean algorithm to calculate the GCF of 60, 67 and 83?
We would strongly recommend against it.
Just because something should be done, doesn't mean it should be done.
That principle applies here. The Euclidean algorithm is not the best method to calculate the GCF of 60, 67 and 83.
The Euclidean algorithm is best suited for calculating the GCF of 2 numbers. For 60, 67 and 83, we have 3 numbers.
So, we advise using the prime factorization method to calculate the GCF here. It is much simpler and easier to understand.
However, if you are interested in learning more about the Euclidean algorithm, you can look at one of the examples below:
The Binary GCD algorithm is an algorithm that computes the greatest common divisor of two nonnegative integers
The algorithm reduces the problem of finding the GCD of two nonnegative integers by repeatedly applying the identity
This is a relatively efficient algorithm for large numbers, even though it involves several divisions, so we don't recommend using it for small numbers.